Since January, large news corporations have been making cuts to jobs after being deemed unprofitable.
Buzzfeed was the first to announce layoffs at 15 percent of their workforce (about 200 people). Next was Verizon Media Group, which owns the Huffington Post and AOL, laying off eight percent of their workforce (about 800 people). And Gannett was third.
Part of the reason these companies have to cut is because of slow advertising. Facebook and Google are at the top of the advertising food chain, getting more for their dollar than the rest of their competition.
New York Times media reporter Edmund Lee said this:
“The conceit around the Internet is it’s sort of vast and endless and all kinds of places to go. In reality, it’s really just Facebook and Google and sort of everyone else.”
All of the job cuts means journalism as a whole is in more danger than just the Trump administration goes. Lee mentioned that we might see companies merging in the near future (i.e. BuzzFeed joins Vox).
I think mergers would be a great way to join audience groups together to indulge on the same style of content in one place rather than many. Like I’ve said before, I never really considered BuzzFeed or likewise media to be news corporations, so consolidating them to one or two would be ideal.
Since the layoffs, BuzzFeed News employees have decided to unionize and encourage compensation of their then-coworkers.
The group published a letter on Medium urging Ben Smith, editor, to pay for the laid-off employees’ vacation days and paid time off that had not been taken. Smith et al. read the letter and chose to compensate all employees who had been laid off.
“We look forward to meeting with the organizers to discuss a way toward voluntarily recognizing their union,” Smith said.
If BuzzFeed recognizes the union, they will have to negotiate who would be covered. If not, the union leaders will bring forth a “union election with an official from the National Labor Relations Board present to facilitate a secret ballot,” according to the New York Times.

nnection with the ads. These three are sparked by: joy, anxiety, and the value of lifelong memories.
something has happened to them. In this case, it is featuring the distracted teens in car accidents. The teens (while somehow unharmed) are so distracted, that they go about their business, wether it’s texting, eating, etc, completely unaware that they were in an accident. Subaru uses this ad to tug at parents’ hearts and to get them to connect about teen driving safety. By the end of the commercial, Subaru shows a seen of their new 2019 Subaru alerting a distracted teen who is about to get in an accident herself, thus saving the girl. The mood changes from depressing the whole way through to relief as the mom of the teen gets to watch her teen pull into the driveway, unharmed.
fore. As he walks through, he grows younger, showing the memories and moments are moving back in time. Subaru uses this to show that their brand not only lasts a long time, but is
reliable and durable. The dog pulled at my heart (but admittedly all dogs pull at my heart so no surprise there) as I watched, and I can assume it does for some others as well. While not much is happening through the commercial, Adweek makes a great point that Subaru is “unleashing a new approach” to the car advertising world. They are using a “reverse-chronology concept” to get their story across to their audience.
Subaru takes a final approach in this commercial by capturing the joy that people get from owning a Subaru. I really like this one because the humor and storytelling of the couple as they set off for adventure. Maybe it’s because I’m not a parent yet and can’t relate to the first one as much, but this one just seems to resonate more with me than even the dog one. Sure, the dog was cute, but it didn’t scream “get this car” to be as the third possibly could do if I were searching for a car right now.